28 thoughts on “9th Circuit Oral Argument — State of Hawaii v. Trump (C-SPAN)

  1. If this court sides with anyone but Constitutional Authority of the President, and listens to the Sharia Law Attorney, we the people will hammer congress, the Whitehouse, State Department and DHS to overthrow this attorney, this court and demand disbandment of 9th circuit.
    There is No Safe vetting with these Cointries, its Not Race!

  2. I am quite impressed by the questions being asked of both lawyers, but especially this one. Judge Hawkins has made it clear that this lawyer has argued against his current position in the past. The judges will go away and study the briefs and the transcripts then have the unenviable responsibility of writing a response. I hope the court upholds the Presidents responsibility to determine the safety of the country and its citizens without political interference.

  3. How about those who dont want this to be passed pay out all medical and psychological damage done to those hurt by someone who gets in to the country due to this NOT being passed…

  4. Lots of fancy words and discussion, but at the end of the day, we need to stop humoring that orange idiot. Its IQ's around 30, he should just keep his fucking yap shut and fuck off.

  5. We have the right to protect our boarder's and our country!!! These people are destroying our country if they ALLOW these people HERE!!!!!!

  6. I think it is worth noting that this would be a non-issue if Trump communicated and composed himself in a more tactful matter. Jeffery Walls debate about the danger of courts interfering in national security issues makes a lot of sense. However Trump is conducting himself in such a way that puts his intent at question. It is reasonable that we are having legal debates about discriminatory actions being pushed through in national security orders. This is a dangerous situation either way you look at it, but it was one created by Trump and the way he conducts himself.

  7. Idiot Neal forgot that other presidents mention we don't negotiate with terrorist! Bush said that he label axis of evil countries.

  8. The 9th court isn't going to change their minds. The SUPREME COURT MIGHT BE ABLE TO UNDERSTAND THAT OUR PRESIDENT TOOK AN OATH TO PROTECT AMERICA FROM HARM. MANY OF THE ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS ARE KILLING, RAPING, AND TORTURING AMERICANS. ISIS AND THE SON OF THE TERRORIST THAT BROUGHT DOWN OUR TOWERS ARE THE JOINING POWERS AND HAVE BEEN ORDERED THEIR FOLLOWERS TO KILL AMERICANS ANY WAY THEY CAN. GIVEN THOSE THREATS, OUR PRESIDENT SHOULD BE ABLE TO DEPORT AND STOP Entrance of illegal immigrants until our nation can become stable. NINTH COURT IS BIASED TO OBAHMA AND CLINTON. SEND TREY GOWDY TO ARGUE THIS CASE FOR THE PRESIDENT, HE KNOWS EXACTLY WHERE THE NINTH DISTRICT COURT IS MISS APPLYING THEIR RILING.

  9. not. every graduated from your spelled out dramatics or even is aware of your tripped out abc all of a sudden supposed important

  10. Pending Case of Note – Ninth Cir. case No. 12-15938 Alvaro Rodriguez v. State of California. Seven judges are accused with perpetrating a fraud on the United States Courts. The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals is currently Reviewing a Motion to Recall a Mandate and Set Aside a Judgment for Fraud on the Court. The former Ninth Circuit chief judge is accused with issuing two false statements and concealing a "fraudulent scheme of public corruption" when a Complaint was filed on Dec. 12, 2013 No. 13-90201, involving a district judge who concealed a "fraud on the court" perpetrated by five California state judges. Fact – [N]o "accusatory pleadings" or criminal charges were filed by the state to justify a conviction. The Calif. Dept. of Motor Vehicles issued an "Order of Set Aside" on Oct. 3, 1991. On May 7, 1993 the victim of fraud and deceit was convicted. The "Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction" over the defendant and of the state and federal courts was deliberately concealed by all officers of the court involved in this wrongful DUI conviction. The Motion was filed on June 22, 2016 by the victim in pro se. On July 27, 2017 a Court Clerk stated the case is under Review and pending.

  11. Proof of Public Corruption in the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. Victim of fraud and deceit by members of the legal profession uncovers a fraud on the court. The case is under Review and pending. Alvaro Rodriguez v. State of California, Ninth Cir. No. 12-15938.

  12. The corruption in hawaii goes so dam deep ! I live in hawaii , born and raised . The good police officers and politicians get no where in their jobs . If you play ball and do things that abuses your power to get ahead then they are on the fast track to better career opportunities . The main reason for this is since the illegal overthrow of Queen Liliokalani ever predecessor must be willing to continue on with the illegal occupation of hawaii . They have to continue on with the fraud,theft , corruption,lies, enslavement , and racketeering of the islands and the people on them .

  13. And the Supreme Court will reject your racist claims
    Trump is fullfiling his campaign hypothetical statements

  14. The 9th Circuit DOES NOT and WILL NEVER care about the "law" …… they will rule against the President of the United States even if his actions were CLEARLY lawful.   They have no interest in justice, just in ruiling against ANYTHING that President Trump is trying to do.   PERIOD!    The 9th Circuit is the most overturned appeals court in our nations history.   This is why!

  15. 9th circuit needs to be gone. All scumbag lib morons destroying society with their failed ideology.
    SF and LA looks like North Korea.

  16. I don’t even support the ban, at least as it was originally intended, but the solicitor general makes objectively far better arguments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *