Designing the brain of the Home of the Future with Grant Imahara


(upbeat music) – Getting smart home technology for a home of the future
has never been easier. There are smart versions of
just about every household item. Smart lights, smart speakers,
even a smart refrigerator. But connecting them all together to make a truly smarter
home can be a nightmare. So how do we connect
the home of the future? Well, you need a serious
brain, like this thing. And to integrate it, requires
some serious brain power. Pete Sandford is the
owner of Smarter Homes, a company that helps to
customize and maintain home automation systems. He’s what’s known as an integrator, and his role is to bring
all the smart devices of the home together, which is essential for
the home of the future we’re building here in Austin, Texas. ‘Cause we’ve got a truckload of cutting edge technology to install. – This is probably 25%
of what’s gonna come and make the home of the future. – You’re kidding me. The home of the future
has a lot of stuff in it. – [Pete] Yeah, takes a
lot of parts and pieces and everything’s gotta
speak the same language. – [Grant] Wow, that’s a lotta languages. – [Pete] Oh yeah. – [Grant] Someday these
devices might be fluent right out of the box. But for now, we need
an integrator like Pete to give the different
dialects universal language. And even a tech savvy guy like me who’s more than capable of
installing his own smart devices would have his hands full
trying to unify everything. Over the next month or so, Pete and his team will
work to wire the home to handle all the smart
technology we’re packing into it. Now maybe you’re thinking, “Wires? Shouldn’t our
future be more wireless?” While there’s some promising
developments in wireless power, we’re still years away from having anything reliable enough
to even consider installing in our home. So instead, for Pete and his team, their goal is to make
these wires invisible. So, Peter this is the moment of truth. I mean, last time I was here, this was just a hole in the wall with a bunch of wires coming out of it and now we have the super
computer brain of our house. I mean, when I think of a super computer, I think of War Games
and the whopper computer the (making whirring sound) But, this is gorgeous. What’s inside here? – Everything. This is as good as it gets when we’re talking smart home technology. So, here we’ve got our two Sonos players for feeding the indoor and outdoor audio, our Wattbox, which is acting as a cutoff for power to each individual
piece of equipment. We’ve got our Luxul switch
which is feeding network to all the individual
pieces of components. We’ve also got our AT&T modem. That’s feeding the
internet from the street into our system here and then
out throughout the house. Our Denon surround sound receiver which is handling all the surround sound in this room and the video
and audio in the next room. We’ve got our Lutron communicator which is wirelessly communicating with all the light switches. Our two Roku players for both
this room and the bedroom. Our amplifier here which is powering all the landscape speakers
and subterraneal subwoofer. We’ve got our PlayStation 4 for gaming, and finally, probably the
most important part in here is the brain which is
the RTI XP-8 processor. And this really helps
us bring all of these individual items together
and integrate them onto one easy-to-use interface. – So you don’t have a million remotes. – Yeah, or a million apps. (laughs) – That RTI system that Pete mentioned, you can think of it as
the operating system for the entire house. And it’s highly customizable
based on the user’s needs. So this is the whole
interface for everything that’s in that rack? – Yup. This is Remote Technologies, Inc., sitting with us is Matt, he is our wizard, or RTI programmer. And he’s the one who makes
the system easy to use and function organically with a family. – So through this interface
you’re controlling everything in the house of the future? – Pretty much everything. Some devices don’t connect
into automation systems, they might have a closed
or a partially closed API. – [Grant] API or application
programming interface is the key part of how you
integrate products into the home. Devices with very open APIs allow us to integrate their controls in a deep way with the home system. Whereas devices with closed
APIs block our ability to link their features
with the rest of the home. For example, our Nest security
camera on the front door has a closed API, so we couldn’t get that camera feed into the RTI system. In contrast, the IP
cameras around the home are completely able to
be integrated with RTI, which allows us to pull up a feed of what’s going on around the home directly from the RTI system. – So, this is the dashboard
for the entire home. Got our controls and
activities for the living room, our patio audio, our nest climate control
for the whole house. Normally, in most systems, you’ll just see it’ll say Apple TV. Here we’ve dialed it in to specific apps. So I know I watch Netflix, I watch Hulu, everything that needs to
happen to watch Netflix then happens at the push of that one button without navigating anything. – Okay, so let’s say I
got a new gaming system, I see you’ve got a PS4,
what if I got an XBox. – [Pete] We could just
grab in an XBox icon, and then program it to where it’ll switch to that gaming input for the Xbox just at the single push of a button. – [Grant] RTI is also
able to plug into Alexa, which opens up the entire
system to voice control. However it introduces an extra step. Instead of saying,
“Alexa, turn on Netflix.”, I’ll have to say, “Alexa, tell Home Butler
to turn on Netflix.” So, a little more awkward and frustrating if you forget, but soon we’re told that the system will be upgraded to avoid having to do this additional step. – But that’s kinda the easy
side of the programming. Matt gets us into more
of the advanced side, where you’ll have shortcuts, you know, for things that you do everyday. So like Good Morning or Good
Night or Welcome Home or Away. – So show me what Welcome Home does. – So come in here, open up that function. You’ll see right now
we’ve got that programmed to set the living room to Netflix, playing some music in the landscape, we’re altering the
thermostat temperature to 70, and then we’ll turn on
some lights in the kitchen, the living room. But only if it’s dark, so if you’re coming home in the day, the rest of the functions
will still happen, but the lights will stay
off to conserve energy. – And that level of house
wide control of our devices is really the strength
in a system like RTI. The ability to string
together so many devices to function as one home is the goal of the home of the future. The downside to this smart integration? Well, besides the up front fees, there’s a $30 monthly service
charge for tech support, and a twice a year visit from a programmer to make any changes. So Matt I’m looking at this, and I’m getting really excited
’cause I’m an engineer. Is this something that I
could take this software and run with it myself? – No, the end user
doesn’t actually typically program the system, we
do that just for the sake that we can make sure we get
everything in the right order. – So you’re saying no to prevent me from being a danger to myself. – Correct. – And while it would take a lot of work to attempt this kind of
high-level integration ourselves, a low-cost workaround is
to use only smart devices that already speak the same language. For example, if you got
Google Home, Chromecast, and Hue lights, you
could probably get most of the features that we have in our home for under 200 bucks. But for the home of the future, having a bunch of smart devices
alone isn’t good enough. All this technology needs to
function together seamlessly. – My job as the integrator is
to take all of these things and make them all communicate
together on one system that’s easy to use. – Might not be all the way there yet, but we’re closer than ever. For now, our home of the future
is as unified as it gets, making life more convenient and enjoyable with the push of a button. Thank you so much for watching. Now that you know what it takes to connect the devices inside
of our home of the future, how do you integrate the
devices inside of your home? Let us know in the comments below and we’ll see you next
week with a new episode.

100 thoughts on “Designing the brain of the Home of the Future with Grant Imahara

  1. Please clarify the $30 a month is probably for Domotz. It is a remote management that’s part of Luxul Network gear. It monitors all of your network devices and lets you know if something has issues.

  2. This is not the home of the future. ADT offers this simple offering. The end user is the cash cow, so we program it for you. Arghh

  3. This is way too complicated to be the home of the future. Ridiculous lol. People should wait 3 years before installing incredibly complicated systems like this.

  4. They failed right out of the gate with a proprietary system and integrator. Big $$$ and ongoing fees forever when you need to update or add/remove items.

  5. $30. a month? really. RTI remotes and automation are not difficult to program, RTI want to get an easy money which is not fair. at all.

  6. Don't listen to this video, its a pile of horse poop, My house has every devices connected to the internet, either through Wifi or connected Ethernet… I had no dude shuffling below my floor boards..
    Most ISP's give a moderate modem/router, if the range isn't great for you then you can use Wireless Access Point (they plug in you power socket and boost the range) or an Ethernet power line adapter (again plug in to power socket, new ones give you the power plug back).

    I would say that a good modem and Router is the key, don't always stick with the ISP's choice.. I'm in the UK and I have replaced my Modem/Router with a DrayKet Vigor 130, connected to a TP-Link Archer 5400 MU-MIMO Tri-Band router, I get extended Wi-Fi range and every device in the house has Internet Connection

    At the moment (22:32 at night) I can see 4 wired connections and 9 Wireless connections.

  7. why bother with the renewable energy when you are running around with that huge product placement Ford and are packing an army of devices that will be obsolete within a year and are running a server that uses more energy per month that your typical dishwasher 😉

  8. I see many comments about the lack of user programming.
    That is the #1 deterrent for me.

    There is no reason other than lack of unifying structure.
    All smart devices should be able to host a webpage and password access.
    DIY ESP32 stuff is all over, but most require using their app to setup.

  9. It completely loses scalability for new technologies. This system doesn't make any sense to me. And more, think about selling your home after couple of years, your house's new owner would barely love the bunch of mess in the wall.

  10. logitech harmony does just that. I have the same setup. Btw, if you use a good AP like the ubiquity, you can support dozens of devices

  11. This video didn't really do anything to convince me that there was any reason I would need a smart home or why it's the home of the future? It's a lot of wires and infrastructure for the convenience of not having to get up to turn on a light switch?

  12. SmartThings + actiontiles = everything they did at substantially less cost, with no monthly fees, and frankly a better UI.

    The only myth that needs busting on this one is why I wasted 9min watching this.

  13. home of the future trying to be energy efficient and more sustainable for the planet, yet a truck instead of a tesla.. 🤔

  14. RTI(savant, control4, urc, crestron) is a high-end home automation integration system meant for clients that demand reliability. It's definitely overkill for most of The Verge's viewers. But the customizability far exceeds anything one can pull off with a handful of Amazon gadgets. I would even go as far to say this is a modest set up. Nevertheless, an $80k home automation experience cannot be matched with $900 bucks worth of "smart home" gadgets.

  15. This is ridiculous they're making it a like a big deal like it's really easy i have 90% of their stuff and I've set them up on my own not a team and wires and all that crappy stuff
    ..

  16. Wtf just get a raspi 4 and install openhab on it and Programm your chirps and other stuff and you have the same thing just better

  17. Coded on windows, displayed on an iPad. Lutron? Really… Can you use zwave/zigbee? What happens now that Google has closed NEST?

  18. I can be wrong, but those devices seem to have so little space for them to breathe. or maybe you already have ventilation that you didn't mention 🙂

  19. Anybody here know what the cabinet that holds the "brain" is called? I wanna make a clean server rack for my home office

  20. Home Assistant. End. Sometimes it's better to make a little effort and get into the learning curve. Then you see things like this and they are useless and/or expensive without any purpose. Don't fall in "okay, but you have to study at NASA to get HA running and then it's horrible", do not. It can be customized up to the maximum detail AND (most important), you can use it trough Apple Home for example. So anyone can use it with a nice/known/integrated interface.

  21. Sorry, but I prefer to hardwire. Faster and more reliable, especially for networking a smart home and the devices inside into one hub.

  22. The thing is, Why does it have to be just one system, I have both Alexa and Google Home products, they are individually good for different things and it works, its not exactly hard to ask either Google or Alexa to do something and it costs VASTLY less than a system like this.

  23. Grant is a lost soul and a sellout. Who would have guessed looking back at his mythbusters beggings
    DOnt listen to a word he says.

  24. 2:26, Does anyone know the name of the brand which produces those server cases? All the ones I've found online have a metal outer shell, of which looks too industrial. I'm looking for a style just like that.

  25. Yeah….thats gonna be a no from me dawg.

    Nice try though. For $30 a month I can do all of that and more with an ever-expanding RPi cluster. All of that aside, theres open sourced software and IFTTT that can do much of that integration without paying someone else. Then again…theres a lot of money to be made off of the technically inept.

  26. This seems more like the high-end home of about 10 years ago. The home of the future has AI to learn the preferences of the residents and automates everything.

  27. Im using an Elan G1 controller to integrate my lights, locks, cctv, alarm, hvac, and A/V. It's a PITA to program but works reliably.

  28. When I think of Smart home. I think of electronic controlled door locks. Sliding doors that slide into the wall. Auto Light on, RGB room lights, etc.

  29. I have had a Logitech Harmony that has been able to do this for years. I programmed it to control all 3 TVs in my home. At the switch of a button, any TV can switch between cable, media player, gaming system, etc. I can control lights, AC, fans, etc…

  30. Solutions such as RTI or control4 and others are overkill, not customizable by the end user without contacting their engineer (and hence a closed system essentially), so for DIY enthusiasts they are an expensive option. Google Home is developing so fast that they will trump such services very soon with their easy to use interface and scale of out of the box integrated vendors.

  31. Why camera Focus on Luxul Switch when he is saying about the RTI Processor ..Just syaing..No offence ..All the Best for the upcoming projects

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *